<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pid Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/pid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2023 22:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>If R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative, then R is a field</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field We will use the fact that every prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal, which we have proved here. Prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field Proof: given [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/">If R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative, then R is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field</h1>
<p>We will use the fact that every prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal, which we have proved <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/">here</a>.</p>
<h2>Prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field</h2>
<p><strong>Proof:</strong> given <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span> is a principal ideal domain. We have proven <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain">here</a> <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is an integral domain since it is a subring of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span>. Further, we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]/(x) \cong R</span> and since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is an integral domain, we do know that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(x)</span> is a prime ideal. But every prime ideal is a maximal ideal and therefore <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]/(x)</span> must be a field, which implicates that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a field.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/">If R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative, then R is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R[x]]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that a subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain The reader should know that only proving that the subring has no zero divisors is not enough. A subring should also contain the identity element. Prove that a subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain Proof: we [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain/">A subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that a subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain</h1>
<p>The reader should know that only proving that the subring has no zero divisors is not enough. A subring should also contain the identity element.</p>
<h2>Prove that a subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain</h2>
<p><strong>Proof:</strong> we take the principal ideal domain <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span> and let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> be its subring. Let&#8217;s assume that we have the non-zero elements <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">ab = 0</span>, i.e., <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> are zero divisors. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R \subset R[x]</span>, we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">ab = 0</span>, but that is a contradiction since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span> has no zero divisors since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span> is an integral domain.</p>
<p>Now we need to figure out if <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> contains the identity element. But, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span> contains the identity element since it is a principal ideal domain, and therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> too (so <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1_R \neq 0_R</span>).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain/">A subring R of the PID R[x] is an integral domain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any two nonzero elements of a principal ideal domain have a least common multiple</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/any-two-nonzero-elements-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-have-a-least-common-multiple/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/any-two-nonzero-elements-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-have-a-least-common-multiple/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a least common multiple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that any two nonzero elements of a principal ideal domain have a least common multiple In order to prove that statement, let&#8217;s recall what actually a least common multiple is. Let nonzero elements, where is a P.I.D. A least common multiple of and is an element of such that: and if and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/any-two-nonzero-elements-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-have-a-least-common-multiple/">Any two nonzero elements of a principal ideal domain have a least common multiple</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that any two nonzero elements of a principal ideal domain have a least common multiple</h1>
<p>In order to prove that statement, let&#8217;s recall what actually a least common multiple is. Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in R</span> nonzero elements, where <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a P.I.D. A least common multiple of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> is an element <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">e</span> of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> such that:</p>
<ol>
<li> <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \mid e</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b \mid e</span> </li>
<li> if <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \mid e'</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b \mid e'</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">e \mid e'</span>
</ol>
<h2>Prove that any two nonzero elements of a principal ideal domain have a least common multiple</h2>
<p><strong>Proof:</strong> let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(a) \cap (b) = (e)</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(e) \subseteq (a)</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(e) \subseteq (b)</span>. This means that there exists <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r_1,r_2 \in R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a=r_1e</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b=r_2e</span>. This implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \mid e</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b \mid e</span>, which proves the first statement.</p>
<p>If <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \mid e'</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b \mid e'</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(e') \subseteq (a)</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(e') \subseteq (b)</span>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(a) \cap (b) = (e)</span>, we must have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">e' \in (e)</span>, which means there exists <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r \in R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">er = e'</span>, and therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">e \mid e'</span>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/any-two-nonzero-elements-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-have-a-least-common-multiple/">Any two nonzero elements of a principal ideal domain have a least common multiple</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/any-two-nonzero-elements-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-have-a-least-common-multiple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two ideals (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b) = 1</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/two-ideals-a-and-b-in-pid-are-comaximal-iff-gcdab-1/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/two-ideals-a-and-b-in-pid-are-comaximal-iff-gcdab-1/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comaximal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that two ideals (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b) = 1 The best way to tackle this problem is by using the definition of a comaximal. Prove that any two ideal (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b)=1 Proof: let be a PID. We will start with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/two-ideals-a-and-b-in-pid-are-comaximal-iff-gcdab-1/">Two ideals (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b) = 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that two ideals (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b) = 1</h1>

The best way to tackle this problem is by using the definition of a comaximal.
<br>
<br>
<h2>Prove that any two ideal (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b)=1</h2>

<strong>Proof:</strong> let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> be a PID. We will start with the right implication:

<p>&#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Rightarrow</span>&#8220;: let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">d</span> be the generator for the principal ideal generated by <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span>, i.e., 

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{equation*}
(d) = (a,b) = \{ax+by \ | \ x,y\in R\}.
\end{equation*}</pre></div>

We have given that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(a) + (b) = R</span> since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(a)</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(b)</span> are comaximal. So this means that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1 \in (a) + (b) </span> and therefore we have an <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>-linear combination <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">ax + by = 1</span> for some <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x,y\in R</span>. This means that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">gcd(a,b) = 1</span> since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">ax + by \in (a,b)</span>.
</p>

<p>&#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Leftarrow</span>&#8220;: reverse the previous proof.<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/two-ideals-a-and-b-in-pid-are-comaximal-iff-gcdab-1/">Two ideals (a) and (b) in PID are comaximal iff gcd(a,b) = 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/two-ideals-a-and-b-in-pid-are-comaximal-iff-gcdab-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A quotient of a principal ideal domain by a prime is again a P.I.D.</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-quotient-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-by-a-prime-is-again-a-p-i-d/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-quotient-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-by-a-prime-is-again-a-p-i-d/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that quotient of a principal ideal domain by a prime is again a P.I.D. The best way to tackle this problem is by using the fact every prime ideal is a maximal ideal in a P.I.D. Prove that a quotient of a P.I.D. by a prime ideal is again a P.I.D. Proof: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-quotient-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-by-a-prime-is-again-a-p-i-d/">A quotient of a principal ideal domain by a prime is again a P.I.D.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that quotient of a principal ideal domain by a prime is again a P.I.D.</h1>
<p>The best way to tackle this problem is by using the fact every prime ideal is a maximal ideal in a P.I.D.</p>
<h2>Prove that a quotient of a P.I.D. by a prime ideal is again a P.I.D.</h2>
<p><strong>Proof:</strong> let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P</span> be a prime ideal of the principal ideal domain <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>. Every prime ideal is a maximal ideal in <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>, which we have proven <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal">here</a>. So, we get that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/P</span> is a field, again, which we have seen earlier <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-the-zero-ideal-is-the-maximal-ideal-of-r/">here</a>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/P</span>, it is definitely a P.I.D. too, which completes this proof.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-quotient-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-by-a-prime-is-again-a-p-i-d/">A quotient of a principal ideal domain by a prime is again a P.I.D.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-quotient-of-a-principal-ideal-domain-by-a-prime-is-again-a-p-i-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Every nonzero prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maximal ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime ideal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to show that every prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal The easiest way to prove this is to use the definitions of a prime ideal, maximal ideal, and P.I.D. In the proof below, we want to show that is either a maximal ideal or a P.I.D. Prove that every prime ideal [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/">Every nonzero prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to show that every prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal</h1>
<p>The easiest way to prove this is to use the definitions of a prime ideal, maximal ideal, and P.I.D. In the proof below, we want to show that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P</span> is either a maximal ideal or a P.I.D.</p>
<h2>Prove that every prime ideal in P.I.D. is a maximal ideal</h2>
<p><strong>Proof:</strong> Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P = (p)</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M = (m)</span> be a prime ideal and a maximal ideal of the principal ideal domain <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>, respectively. Take for the assumption that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P</span> is contained in <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span>. Then there exists an element <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r \in R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">p = rm</span>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P</span> is a prime ideal, we have that either <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r \in P</span> or <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m \in P</span>. If <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m \in P</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P</span> is the maximal ideal. If <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r \in P</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = px</span> for some <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x \in R</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">p = rm = pxm</span> which means that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">xm = 1</span>, so this implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m</span> is a unit. So <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">P = R</span>.</p>
<p>Therefore, we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"></span>P = M) or <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"></span>P = R).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/">Every nonzero prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
