<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Z Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/z/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 22:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The integers are a Euclidean Domain</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-integers-are-a-euclidean-domain/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-integers-are-a-euclidean-domain/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2023 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euclidean domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that the integers are a Euclidean Domain To show that the integers are a Euclidean domain (or possess a Division Algorithm), finding one norm only to verify the conditions to be a Euclidean Domain is enough. Proof that the integers are Euclidean Domain Proof: Define the following norm: where . We need [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-integers-are-a-euclidean-domain/">The integers are a Euclidean Domain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that the integers are a Euclidean Domain</h1>

To show that the integers are a Euclidean domain (or possess a Division Algorithm), finding one norm only to verify the conditions to be a Euclidean Domain is enough.
<br>
<br>
<h2>Proof that the integers are Euclidean Domain</h2>

<strong>Proof:</strong> Define the following norm:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{equation*}
N(x) = \lvert x \rvert,
\end{equation*}</pre></div>

where <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. We need to show that for any two elements <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in \mathbb{Z}</span> with <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b\neq 0</span> there exists elements <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">q</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r</span> in <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> such that

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{equation*}
a = qb + r \quad \text{with} \quad r = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad N(r) < N(q).
\end{equation*} </pre></div>

We let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> be nonzero elements and we will check two cases: <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> > <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span>. 
<br>
<p>For <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> > <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span>, let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \in [qb, (q + 1)b)</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a = qb + r</span> where <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r \in [0, \lvert b \rvert)</span> since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = a - qb</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(q + 1)b - qb = b</span>. Therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">N(r)</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">N(b) = \lvert b \rvert</span> or <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = 0</span>.</p>

<p>For <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span>, we take <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \in [-qb, -(q + 1)b)</span> since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">-b</span> > <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a = q\cdot (-b) + r</span> where <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = a + qb</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">-(q + 1)b - qb = -b</span>. Obviously, since -b > 0, we have that  <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\lvert r \rvert = N(r)</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">N(-b) = \lvert -b \rvert</span> or <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = 0</span>.</p>

<p>We haven't included the case when the remainder is negative in all the above cases. The approach is similar to the above. Take the elements <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b</span> > <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and use the same properties we used there and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r &gt; 0</span> (note that we don't take this remainder to be negative!). Now let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a = q'b + r'</span>, where <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">q' = q + 1</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r' = r - b</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r'</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r \in [0, \lvert b \rvert)</span>. Now we can perform the rest as <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r - b \in (-b, b)</span>: </p>

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
r - b < 0 &#038;\iff r < b \\
&#038;\iff r - b < b \\
&#038;\iff r' < b \\
&#038;\iff \lvert r' \rvert < \lvert b \rvert \\
&#038;\iff N(r') < N(b),
\end{align*}</pre></div>

which ends the proof by showing that the integers are indeed a Euclidean Domain.

We could also prove everything with induction, but that is something that the reader can verify (but you can always leave a comment if you want know it).<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-integers-are-a-euclidean-domain/">The integers are a Euclidean Domain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-integers-are-a-euclidean-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prove that Z is not a group under multiplication</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-z-is-not-a-group-under-multiplication/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-z-is-not-a-group-under-multiplication/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Group Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Prove that is not a group under multiplication . I do expect that when you are learning group theory and you search for an answer to the question above, you want to know how to tackle such a question. While this can be answered in one sentence, I will take you through the whole process [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-z-is-not-a-group-under-multiplication/">Prove that Z is not a group under multiplication</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong> Prove that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> is not a group under multiplication </strong>.
<br>
<br>
I do expect that when you are learning group theory and you search for an answer to the question above, you want to know how to tackle such a question. While this can be answered in one sentence, I will take you through the whole process of what you need to do.
<br>
<br>
<strong>Proof.</strong> Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> be the set of integers. To be a group under multiplication, i.e., <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\mathbb{Z},\times)</span>, we must verify three things: associativity, identity, and inverse elements. Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b,c \in \mathbb{Z}</span>.
<br>
<br>
It is straightforward by the definition of integers that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(a \times b)\times c = a \times (b \times c)</span>. So for all elements in <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> we know that the operation multiplication is associative.
<br>
<br>
Next, we need to find the identity element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> under multiplication. This is easy since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1</span> is identity element (note that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \times 1 = 1 \times a = a</span>). 
<br>
<br>
Finally, the last step is to find the inverse elements of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> under multiplication. Now we take the element <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. Does this mean that there is an inverse element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a</span> under multiplication? In other words, is there an element <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a^{-1} \in \mathbb{Z}</span> such that: 

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
a \times a^{-1} = a^{-1} \times a = 1?
\end{align*}</pre></div>

Assume it is true with <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a \neq 1</span>. Then it means that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a^{-1} = \frac{1}{a} \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. But then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\frac{1}{a}</span> is a rational number, which isn&#8217;t contained in the set of integers. So <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Z}</span> can&#8217;t be a group under multiplication since for all integers (expect for the identity element <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1</span>) there is no inverse element.
<br>
<br>
A short counterexample you could give: <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">2</span> has no inverse element since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\frac{1}{2} \not \in \mathbb{Z}</span>.<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-z-is-not-a-group-under-multiplication/">Prove that Z is not a group under multiplication</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-z-is-not-a-group-under-multiplication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
