<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>field Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 22:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>If R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative, then R is a field</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How to prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field We will use the fact that every prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal, which we have proved here. Prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field Proof: given [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/">If R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative, then R is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>How to prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field</h1>
<p>We will use the fact that every prime ideal in a P.I.D. is a maximal ideal, which we have proved <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/every-nonzero-prime-ideal-in-a-principal-ideal-domain-is-a-maximal-ideal/">here</a>.</p>
<h2>Prove that if R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative then R is a field</h2>
<p><strong>Proof:</strong> given <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span> is a principal ideal domain. We have proven <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/a-subring-r-of-the-pid-polynomial-ring-is-an-integral-domain">here</a> <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is an integral domain since it is a subring of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]</span>. Further, we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]/(x) \cong R</span> and since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is an integral domain, we do know that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(x)</span> is a prime ideal. But every prime ideal is a maximal ideal and therefore <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R[x]/(x)</span> must be a field, which implicates that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a field.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/">If R[x] is a P.I.D. and R commutative, then R is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/if-rx-is-a-p-i-d-and-r-commutative-then-r-is-a-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ideal M of R is maximal iff the quotient ring R/M is a field</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-ideal-m-of-r-is-maximal-iff-the-quotient-ring-is-a-field/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-ideal-m-of-r-is-maximal-iff-the-quotient-ring-is-a-field/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R/M is a field]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let be a commutative ring with identity . The ideal of is maximal iff the quotient ring is a field. Proof. This proof can be easily done by using the Lattice Isomorphism Theorem of Rings. &#8220;&#8221;: Given maximal ideal of . By the Lattice Isomorphism Theorem of Rings, the ideals of containing correspond bijectively with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-ideal-m-of-r-is-maximal-iff-the-quotient-ring-is-a-field/">The ideal M of R is maximal iff the quotient ring R/M is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> be a commutative ring with identity <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1 \neq 0</span>. The ideal <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is maximal iff the quotient ring <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span> is a field.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Proof.</strong> This proof can be easily done by using the <em>Lattice Isomorphism Theorem of Rings</em>.</p>
<p>&#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Rightarrow</span>&#8220;: Given maximal ideal <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>. By the <em>Lattice Isomorphism Theorem of Rings</em>, the ideals of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> containing <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> correspond bijectively with the ideals of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span>. The only ideals of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> that consist <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> are <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> itself. So we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/R \cong 0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span> are ideals of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span>. We use a handy proposition which we have proven <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r">here</a> which implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span> is a field. </p>
<p>&#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Leftarrow</span>&#8220;: Given <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span> a field. Then by this proposition <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r">here</a>, we have that the only ideals of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span> are <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R/M</span>. We use the <em>Lattice Isomorphism Theorem of Rings</em> again, which means that there are two ideals consisting <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span>. We know that at least it is <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>, which is already two. This implies there is no ideal <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">I</span> of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M \subset I \subset R</span>. Therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span> is a maximal ideal of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-ideal-m-of-r-is-maximal-iff-the-quotient-ring-is-a-field/">The ideal M of R is maximal iff the quotient ring R/M is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-ideal-m-of-r-is-maximal-iff-the-quotient-ring-is-a-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The commutative ring R is a field iff its only ideals are 0 and R</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let be a ring with identity . The commutative ring is a field iff its only ideals are and Proof. We know that a commutative ring is a field if and only if every nonzero element of is a unit. So now can translate the question as the following: Every nonzero element of is a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r/">The commutative ring R is a field iff its only ideals are 0 and R</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> be a ring with identity <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1 \neq 0</span>. The commutative ring <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a field iff its only ideals are <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Proof.</strong> We know that a commutative ring <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a field if and only if every nonzero element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a unit. So now can translate the question as the following: </p>
<p><em>Every nonzero element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a unit iff its only ideals are <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span></em></p>
<p>&#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Rightarrow</span>&#8220;: Assume we have a proper ideal <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">I</span> of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> which is not equal to the zero ideal. Then that ideal <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">I</span> contains a unit element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>, say <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">u \in I</span>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">I</span> is an ideal of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>, we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">Ru \subseteq I</span>. This implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1 \in I</span> since there exists a <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">v \in R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">vu = 1</span>. Therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">I = R</span> and can&#8217;t be a proper ideal of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>.</p>
<p>&#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Leftarrow</span>&#8220;: Assume that the only ideals of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> are <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>. Take an arbitrary nonzero element <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x\in R</span>. We want to prove that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x</span> is a unit. Since the only ideals are <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>, we have that the ideal <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(x)</span> is equal to <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>. So we get that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">1 \in (x)</span>. Therefore, there exist an <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">y \in R</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">xy = 1</span>, and so <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x</span> is a unit of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x</span> is taken arbitrarily, we have that every nonzero element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is a unit. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r/">The commutative ring R is a field iff its only ideals are 0 and R</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-commutative-ring-r-is-a-field-iff-its-only-ideals-are-0-and-r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show that Q[sqrt(2)] is a field</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/field-theory/show-that-q-squareroot-2-is-a-field/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Field Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q[sqrt(2)]]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ring theory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Show that is a field Proof. We have that . So we need to show that all elements in do have an inverse. Indeed, if we take arbitrary such that , then and since and , this implies that is an inverse of . So this implies that is a field. This completes the proof.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/field-theory/show-that-q-squareroot-2-is-a-field/">Show that Q[sqrt(2)] is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Show that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]</span> is a field</b>
<br>
<br>
<strong>Proof.</strong> We have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}] = \{a + b\sqrt{2} \ | \ a,b \in \mathbb{Q} \}</span>. So we need to show that all elements in <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]</span> do have an inverse. Indeed, if we take arbitrary <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in \mathbb{Q}</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a + b \sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]</span>, then

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
1 &= (a + b \sqrt{2}) \frac{a - b \sqrt{2}}{(a + b \sqrt{2})(a - b \sqrt{2})} \\ 
  &= (a + b \sqrt{2}) \frac{a - b \sqrt{2}}{(a^2 - ab\sqrt{2} + ab\sqrt{2} - 2b^2)} \\
  &= (a + b \sqrt{2}) \frac{a - b \sqrt{2}}{(a^2 - 2b^2)}
\end{align*}</pre></div>

and since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a^2 - 2b^2 \in \mathbb{Q}</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a - b \sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]</span>, this implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\frac{a - b \sqrt{2}}{(a^2 - 2b^2)}</span> is an inverse of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a + b \sqrt{2}</span>. So this implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]</span> is a field. This completes the proof.<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/field-theory/show-that-q-squareroot-2-is-a-field/">Show that Q[sqrt(2)] is a field</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
