<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>subring Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/subring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 23:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The set {(r,r) &#124; r in R} is a subring of the ring RxR</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-two-dimensional-array-with-r-and-r-where-r-is-in-r-is-a-subring-of-the-ring-r-times-r/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-two-dimensional-array-with-r-and-r-where-r-is-in-r-is-a-subring-of-the-ring-r-times-r/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subring]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=1997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let be a ring with 1. The set is a subring of the ring . Proof. First, we want to show that the set is nonempty, but that is already easy to see since . Secondly, we want to show that is closed under subtraction. Let , then Since is closed under subtraction, we get [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-two-dimensional-array-with-r-and-r-where-r-is-in-r-is-a-subring-of-the-ring-r-times-r/">The set {(r,r) | r in R} is a subring of the ring RxR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> be a ring with 1. The set <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\{(r,r) | r \in R\}</span> is a subring of the ring <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R \times R</span>.</strong>
<br>
<br>
<strong>Proof.</strong> First, we want to show that the set <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">S = \{(r,r) | r \in R\}</span> is nonempty, but that is already easy to see since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(1,1) \in S</span>.

Secondly, we want to show that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">S</span> is closed under subtraction. Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(r_1,r_1),(r_2,r_2) \in S</span>, then 

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
(r_1,r_1) + (-(r_2,r_2)) &= (r_1,r_1) - (r_2,r_2) \\
&= (r_1 - r_2, r_1 - r_2).
\end{align*}</pre></div>

Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is closed under subtraction, we get that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(r_1 - r_2) \in R</span>. Therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(r_1 - r_2, r_1 - r_2) \in S</span>.

Lastly, we need to show that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">S</span> is closed under multiplication. Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(r_1,r_1),(r_2,r_2) \in S</span>. Then we get the following:


 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
(r_1,r_1)(r_2,r_2) = (r_1r_2,r_1r_2). 
\end{align*}</pre></div>

Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R</span> is closed under multiplication, we get that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r_1r_2 \in R</span>. Therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(r_1r_2,r_1r_2) \in S</span>.

Conclusion, the set <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\{(r,r) | r \in R\}</span> is a subring of the ring <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">R \times R</span>.<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-two-dimensional-array-with-r-and-r-where-r-is-in-r-is-a-subring-of-the-ring-r-times-r/">The set {(r,r) | r in R} is a subring of the ring RxR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-two-dimensional-array-with-r-and-r-where-r-is-in-r-is-a-subring-of-the-ring-r-times-r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
