<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SL_n(F) is a subgroup of GL_n(F) Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/sl_nf-is-a-subgroup-of-gl_nf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Prove that SL_n(F) is a subgroup of GL_n(F)</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-special-linear-group-is-a-subgroup-of-general-linear-group/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-special-linear-group-is-a-subgroup-of-general-linear-group/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Group Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SL_n(F)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SL_n(F) is a subgroup of GL_n(F)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=1728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let be any field. Prove that is a subgroup of . Proof. Let be any field. Recall that the general linear group is defined as: and the special linear group is defined as: We want to show that if , then and . Assume for the first case that . Since , and therefore inverse, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-special-linear-group-is-a-subgroup-of-general-linear-group/">Prove that SL_n(F) is a subgroup of GL_n(F)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">F</span> be any field. Prove that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">SL_n(F)</span> is a subgroup of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">GL_n(F)</span>.
<br>
<br>
<strong>Proof.</strong> Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">F</span> be any field. Recall that the general linear group is defined as:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
GL_n(F) = \{A \ | \ A \text{ is an } n \times n \text{ invertible matrix with entries from } F\}
\end{align*}</pre></div>

and the special linear group is defined as:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
SL_n(F) = \{A \in GL_n(F) \ | \ det(A) = 1\}.
\end{align*}</pre></div>

We want to show that if <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">A,B \in SL_n(F)</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">A^{-1} \in SL_n(F)</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">AB \in SL_n(F)</span>.

Assume for the first case that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">A \in SL_n(F)</span>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">det(A) = 1</span>, and therefore inverse, we have that: 

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
det(A^{-1}) = \frac{1}{det(A)} = \frac{1}{1} = 1.
\end{align*}</pre></div>

So <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">A^{-1} \in SL_n(F)</span>.

For the second case, assume that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">A,B \in SL_n(F)</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">det(A) = det(B) = 1</span>. Now we have that:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
det(AB) = det(A)det(B) = 1.
\end{align*}</pre></div>

Therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">AB \in SL_n(F)</span>.
<br>
<br>
So <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">SL_n(F)</span> is a subgroup of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">GL_n(F)</span>.<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-special-linear-group-is-a-subgroup-of-general-linear-group/">Prove that SL_n(F) is a subgroup of GL_n(F)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-special-linear-group-is-a-subgroup-of-general-linear-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
