<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>natural numbers Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/natural-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2023 21:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The set of natural numbers are well-ordered</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-natural-numbers-are-well-ordered/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-natural-numbers-are-well-ordered/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural numbers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Prove that the set of natural numbers is well-ordered Before we go to the actual proof itself, note that the natural numbers are well-ordered under &#8220;&#8221;. Proof of that the set of natural numbers is well-ordered We define the set , which is an arbitrarily non-empty subset of . Further, we define the set We [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-natural-numbers-are-well-ordered/">The set of natural numbers are well-ordered</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Prove that the set of natural numbers is well-ordered</h1>

Before we go to the actual proof itself, note that the natural numbers are well-ordered under &#8220;<span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\leq</span>&#8220;.

<h2>Proof of that the set of natural numbers is well-ordered</h2>

We define the set <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span>, which is an arbitrarily non-empty subset of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\mathbb{N}</span>. Further, we define the set

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
L := \{l \in \mathbb{N} \ | \ l \leq m, \ \forall m \in \mathbb{N}\}.
\end{align*}</pre></div>

We do know that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">0 \in L</span>, so that is the minimal element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">L</span>. Now take <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l \in L</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l + 1 \not \in L</span>, otherwise we will get the case that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">L = \mathbb{N}</span> (note the induction). Then there exists an <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m \in M</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m</span> < <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l + 1</span>. This implies that

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
m \geq l \quad \text{and} \quad m < l + 1 \iff l \leq m < l + 1.
\end{align*}</pre></div>

It means that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m</span> can't be <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l + 1</span>, but greater or equal to <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l</span>. Since we work with positive integers, there is no integer between <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">l + 1</span>, so <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m = l</span>.

This implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">m</span> must be the minimal element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M</span>. 

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

So the set of natural numbers is well-ordered.
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-natural-numbers-are-well-ordered/">The set of natural numbers are well-ordered</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/ring-theory/the-set-of-natural-numbers-are-well-ordered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
