<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cyclic groups Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/cyclic-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 22:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Any two cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/any-two-cyclic-groups-of-the-same-order-are-isomorphic/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/any-two-cyclic-groups-of-the-same-order-are-isomorphic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Group Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclic groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isomorphism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=2276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Define the following map: where and are cyclic groups of order . Then the map is isomorphic. Proof. We need to prove four things for the map , i.e.: it is well defined, is injective, is surjective, and is a homomorphism. The map is well defined. To show this, we need to prove that if [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/any-two-cyclic-groups-of-the-same-order-are-isomorphic/">Any two cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[Define the following map:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
f: \langle x \rangle &\longrightarrow \langle y \rangle \\
x^k &\longmapsto y^k
\end{align*}</pre></div>

where <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\langle x \rangle</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\langle y \rangle</span> are cyclic groups of order <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">n \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}</span>. Then the map <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span> is isomorphic.
<br>
<br>
<strong>Proof.</strong> We need to prove four things for the map <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span>, i.e.:

<ul>
	<li>it is well defined,</li>
        <li>is injective,</li>
	<li>is surjective,</li>
	<li>and is a homomorphism.</li>
	
</ul>

<strong>The map <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span> is well defined.</strong> To show this, we need to prove that if <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x^r = x^s</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f(x^r) = f(x^s)</span>. We know that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x^{r-s} = 1</span>, which implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">n \mid r-s</span>, i.e., <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = tn + s</span> for some <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">t \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. Now it is a straight calculation that:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
f(x^r) = f(x^{tn + s}) = y^{tn + s} = y^{tn}y^s = y^s = f(x^s).
\end{align*}</pre></div>

So the map is well defined.
<br>
<br>
<strong>The map <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span> is injective.</strong> In order to show that it is injective, it needs to follow that if <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f(x^r) = f(x^s)</span>, then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x^r = x^s</span>. Notice that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">y^r = f(x^r) = f(x^s) = y^s</span>, and therefore, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">y^{r-s} = 1</span>. We apply the same trick as we did when we proved that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span> is well defined map: <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">r = tn + s</span> for some <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">t \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. Therefore, we get:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
x^r = x^{tn + s} = x^{tn}x^s = x^s,
\end{align*}</pre></div>

since both cyclic group have order <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">n</span>. This proves the injectivity.
<br>
<br>
<strong>The map <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span> is surjective.</strong> For each <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">y^k \in \langle y \rangle</span>, there exists an <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">x^k \in \langle x \rangle</span> such that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f(x^k) = y^k</span>. Since both groups do have order <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">n</span>, we have already proved the surjectivity.
<br>
<br>
<strong>The map <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">f</span> is a homomorphism.</strong> This one is pretty straightforward. Take <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. Then

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
f(x^{a} x^{b}) = f(x^{a + b}) = y^{a + b} = y^{a}y^{b} = f(x^a)f(x^b),
\end{align*}</pre></div>

which proves the homomorphism.

We finally proved that any two cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/any-two-cyclic-groups-of-the-same-order-are-isomorphic/">Any two cyclic groups of the same order are isomorphic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/any-two-cyclic-groups-of-the-same-order-are-isomorphic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are cyclic groups abelian?</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/are-cyclic-groups-abelian/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/are-cyclic-groups-abelian/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Group Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclic groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclic groups are abelian]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>All cyclic groups are abelian groups. It is not true that every abelian group is cyclic. Proof. Take the cyclic group . Take the elements . We need to show that . Since is cyclic, we have that and for some . This implies that . This proves that cyclic groups are abelian groups.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/are-cyclic-groups-abelian/">Are cyclic groups abelian?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All cyclic groups are abelian groups. It is not true that every abelian group is cyclic.</p>
<p><strong>Proof.</strong> Take the cyclic group <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">G = \langle g \rangle</span>. Take the elements <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in G</span>. We need to show that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">ab = ba</span>. Since <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">G</span> is cyclic, we have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a = g^i</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b = g^j</span> for some <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">i,j \in \mathbb{Z}</span>. This implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">ab = g^ig^j = g^{i + j} = g^{j + i} = g^jg^i = ba</span>.</p>
<p>This proves that cyclic groups are abelian groups.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/are-cyclic-groups-abelian/">Are cyclic groups abelian?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/are-cyclic-groups-abelian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
