<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aH = bH iff b^-1a in H Archives - Epsilonify</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.epsilonify.com/tag/ah-bh-iff-b-1a-in-h/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Best solutions on internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 21:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Prove that aH = bH iff b^-1a in H</title>
		<link>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-ah-is-equal-to-bh-iff-b-inverse-a-in-h/</link>
					<comments>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-ah-is-equal-to-bh-iff-b-inverse-a-in-h/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mathematician]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Group Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aH = bH iff b^-1a in H]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.epsilonify.com/?p=1382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Let be a subgroup of and . Then if and only if . Proof. This is a straightforward proof. We have that . Multiplying both sides with , we get , which implies that . This means that is an element of , because subgroups contain the identity element. We could write this in summary:</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-ah-is-equal-to-bh-iff-b-inverse-a-in-h/">Prove that aH = bH iff b^-1a in H</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">H</span> be a subgroup of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">G</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">a,b \in G</span>. Then <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">aH = bH</span> if and only if <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b^{-1}a \in H</span>.
<br>
<br>
<strong>Proof.</strong> This is a straightforward proof. We have that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">aH = bH</span>. Multiplying both sides with <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b^{-1}</span>, we get <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b^{-1}(aH) = b^{-1}(bH)</span>, which implies that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b^{-1}aH = H</span>. This means that <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">b^{-1}a</span> is an element of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">H</span>, because subgroups contain the identity element. We could write this in summary:

 <div class="wp-block-katex-display-block katex-eq" data-katex-display="true"><pre>\begin{align*}
aH = bH &\iff b^{-1}(aH) = b^{-1}(bH) \\
&\iff b^{-1}aH = H \\
&\iff b^{-1}a \in H. 
\end{align*}</pre></div><p>The post <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-ah-is-equal-to-bh-iff-b-inverse-a-in-h/">Prove that aH = bH iff b^-1a in H</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.epsilonify.com">Epsilonify</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.epsilonify.com/mathematics/group-theory/prove-that-ah-is-equal-to-bh-iff-b-inverse-a-in-h/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
